India's economy is often described as a fast-growing economy, and the latest Indian GDP figures provide some evidence to validate that description. But what is GDP and what does it reflect? GDP or Gross Domestic Product is the single most important macroeconomic variable that measures the total value of all final goods and services produced in a given country. GDP is a measure of the size and performance of the economy, in aggregate. But like anything, one number conceals more than it reveals. Even though the large rate of GDP growth indicates that we are sharing in a higher standard of living, we need to examine the manner in which we are growing. It is in this regard we look to GDP per capita. GDP per capita divides total GDP by total population and represents a better measure of economic output per person. It is commonly used as a proxy for living standards.
For India, the story told by Indian GDP per capita is considerably different. While overall Indian GDP has grown, the benefits have not been shared equally. This leads to a critical discussion about GDP inequality and whether the myth of shared prosperity holds up against the reality of a widening gap between the rich and the poor. As we delve deeper, we will explore the factors contributing to this disparity and examine what these numbers truly mean for the average Indian.
The remarkable growth of Indian GDP paints an optimistic, and perhaps unrealistic, expectation of wealth available nationwide. Upon further reflection, it becomes clear that the picture is far more complicated. First, although a high Indian GDP growth is a positive indicator of the economy's health, it does not benefit everyone equitably. While overall increases in Indian GDP can be attributed to the growth of the services sector, the benefits of growth are benefitting skilled laborers, and thus urban areas, disproportionately to the rest of the population. Consequently, much of the population, particularly in rural areas and the informal economy, remain on the margins of this wealth generation.
The real issue remains the Indian GDP per capita figures. On average, individuals have seen an increase in income, but not every Indian has a corresponding increase in wealth. This signals an even deeper issue of a booming GDP, contrasted with the inability of the economy to leverage the wealth it generates to benefit everyone equitably. It is this two experiences of the Indian economy—the national economy is booming as many struggle economically.
A nation's Indian GDP is a measure of its economic activity, but it's not a complete measure of its prosperity. A high Indian GDP could coexist with numerous social and economic problems, leading to the widening of GDP disparities. Economic growth typically concentrates gains at the top. Some studies have indicated that consumption inequality in India has decreased, while income inequality is still deeply concerning with a small percentage of the population holding a grossly disproportionate share of national wealth.
A high Indian GDP per capita can be imprecise if a small number of high-income earners artificially raise the average. Genuine prosperity entails more than economic output; it must include the availability of high-quality education, healthcare, and infrastructure. These remain areas where India faces real challenges. A more important question is not just, "What is GDP growth," but "What are the social/human outcomes of that growth?" Until development is inclusive, reaching the broadest swath of society, the expectation of creating a genuinely prosperous India remains elusive for all.
To fully understand the implications of India's Indian GDP growth, one must look beyond the national average to get a sense of the GDP inequality that undoubtedly exists. Although some data from consumption surveys may indicate that inequality has declined, other indicators (for income and wealth) suggest that isn't the whole story. Research reveals a significant concentration of wealth, with a small percentage of the population owning a vast majority of the nation's wealth. This isn't just about income; it has to do with securing wealth and capital.
Adding a layer of complexity, we can examine urban and rural inequality. Cities where services are the largest sector of the Indian GDP have reaped greater reward than rural areas. In addition, gender and caste-based inequality remain acute challenges, particularly for women and historically marginalized communities, who are often working hardest to expand access to economic opportunity. Because of this, growth in Indian GDP per capita disguises a highly unequal playing field.
One significant factor in the gap between the headline Indian GDP numbers and perceived wellbeing is "jobless growth"—a growth in the economy that does not result in sufficient new jobs. This statement is corroborated by sources like the Periodic Labour Force Survey (PLFS). While there is job creation in some high-end skill categories, the larger population faces difficulty in finding meaningful work. For many, the real wages have not increased.
This disconnect between economic growth and job-creation indicates breakdowns in the economic structure. The agricultural sector employs a large segment of the population and is characterized by low productivity. A manufacturing sector that could be a source of large-scale jobs is not growing sufficiently. As a result, high Indian GDP does not equate to widespread economic activity and a higher standard of living. While high Indian GDP growth is a necessary condition to achieve prosperity, it is insufficient by itself. For the benefits to be shared, growth must be accompanied by robust and equitable job creation.
The growing tide of Indian GDP has not lifted all boats equally. A closer examination indicates that only a few large corporations and sectors in services (primarily finance and IT) capture the bulk of the economic benefit. For example, these sectors do not provide many employment opportunities, and their wealth is typically accrued by a small number of shareholders and high-paying skilled workers. Higher corporate profits result in very little change in the actual financial condition of the greater population.
This creation of unequal wealth and opportunity negatively impacts GDP inequality. While overall Indian GDP per capita may rise, that does not mean any change for many people. The growth of the tech economy illustrates this; it created higher income, but it has not been accompanied by better wages for the vast majority of people who work in the informal economy; this begs the logical question— what does Indian GDP growth mean when the benefits are so unevenly distributed?
True prosperity cannot be quantified by a country's Indian GDP alone – it includes the health, education, and nutrition of the population. The continued strong recovery in Indian GDP is nonetheless accompanied by stark challenges in these domains. While total government spending on social sectors has grown, it hasn't always kept pace with the needs of a growing population. This is especially true in relation to out-of-pocket health costs for families and access to quality education – an ongoing barrier, especially in rural areas.
The average Indian GDP per capita can obscure these issues. For instance, significant malnutrition and child stunting remain two problems that aren't witnessed in an Indian GDP report at a general level. A disconnect in Indian GDP reinforcing the idea that a growing Indian GDP alone does not necessarily lead to factors of human development. To make economic growth meaningful, it must lead to improved lives for regular people.
The growing GDP inequality in India is an issue of economics and not simply an issue in social terms. In India, a large share of the population lacks buying power due to stagnant wages, which adversely affects domestic demand. The result is a lack of broad consumption that can slow economic growth and the headline GDP numbers can still be strong (in India this is an interesting dilemma).
In addition to stimulating or slowing growth, GDP inequality can also restrict social mobility.When a person's economic status is based on their family's wealth instead of their talent, it misuses human capital and makes the economy less dynamic. This impacts the overall Indian GDP per capita by not fully using the potential of the population. The purpose of what is GDP growth becomes clear when it creates opportunities for everyone, not just a select few.
Solely using Indian GDP can be misleading. To get a more complete picture of prosperity, we should look at alternative metrics like the Human Development Index (HDI), which measures life expectancy, education, and living standards. The Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) is also useful for identifying deprivations in health, education, and living standards, which persist despite impressive Indian GDP growth.
Beyond these, looking at median incomes and household consumption data is crucial. While the average Indian GDP per capita might rise, median income provides a more accurate view of a typical person's economic reality. A comparison of Indian GDP growth with median earnings can visually highlight the gap between top-line growth and the average citizen's experience. These alternative metrics offer a more honest assessment of India’s progress towards inclusive prosperity.
To promote a more equitable distribution of the gains from India's rising Indian GDP, policymakers have a wide range of instruments available to them.
For example, progressive taxation may help fund social programs and lessen GDP inequality. Public spending targeted to the creation of infrastructure in rural areas can also stimulate local economies and create jobs.
Targeted transfers and social protection programs (subsidies) can also raise the living standards of vulnerable populations directly and change the average Indian GDP per capita.
Investment in public services like health and education is also vital. The more accessible and high quality services that the government invests in, the more opportunities individuals will have to engage in the economy. The government is investing in human capital, the foundation of inclusive growth.
The public discourse around Indian GDP and inequality is often confused by common myths. One is that a rising Indian GDP automatically means everyone is better off, which is not true. Another misconception is that GDP growth is the only measure of success, which overlooks human development and well-being.
A third myth is that GDP inequality is an unavoidable result of economic growth.In fact, the level of inequality is frequently contingent on the policy choices being made. It is possible for a country to have vigorous economic growth while maintaining a more equal society. Lastly, concentrating solely on Indian GDP per capita can be misleading unless the issue of distribution is likewise addressed. Averages can be deceptive if a few people have extremely high incomes, even if the majority see little improvement.
While India's Indian GDP growth is a source of national pride, it doesn't fully capture the country's economic reality. A strong Indian GDP does not necessarily lead to broad-based wealth. The problem of GDP inequality reflects a major disparity between the economy as relatively described in GDP numbers and the actual lived experience of many citizens. Growth has largely been concentrated in select sectors and a small segment of wealth citizenry. Many have been stranded with respect to jobs, income, and public services. For example, when looking at measures beyond Indian GDP per capita - such as the Human Development Index - a more nuanced degree of possibility meaningfully emerges. India must work harder to achieve its aims of inclusive growth relative to wealth and opportunities.
A rising Indian GDP measures the total value of goods produced but not how that wealth is distributed. While the economy grows, the gains might be concentrated among a few, leaving the majority with stagnant wages and limited opportunities.
The idea that some GDP inequality is needed for growth is a myth. While some may arise from innovation, excessive inequality can hurt the economy by suppressing consumer demand and reducing social mobility. A more inclusive model is often more sustainable in the long run.
Indicators like the Human Development Index (HDI), Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI), and median income data provide a more complete picture than just Indian GDP or Indian GDP per capita. These metrics better reflect the economic reality for the average person.
High GDP inequality can hurt jobs and demand. When a large portion of the population has low wages, their buying power is limited. This reduces domestic consumption, which can lead to slower job creation.
A mix of policies can help, including progressive tax systems, investments in public services like education and healthcare, and targeted infrastructure projects in underserved regions. These policies help bridge the gap and foster more inclusive growth.
Discover investment portfolios that are designed for maximum returns at low risk.
Learn how we choose the right asset mix for your risk profile across all market conditions.
Get weekly market insights and facts right in your inbox
It depicts the actual and verifiable returns generated by the portfolios of SEBI registered entities. Live performance does not include any backtested data or claim and does not guarantee future returns.
By proceeding, you understand that investments are subjected to market risks and agree that returns shown on the platform were not used as an advertisement or promotion to influence your investment decisions.
"I was drawn to Wright Research due to its multi-factor approach. Their Balanced MFT is an excellent product."
By Prashant Sharma
CTO, Zydus
By signing up, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy
"I was drawn to Wright Research due to its multi-factor approach. Their Balanced MFT is an excellent product."
By Prashant Sharma
CTO, Zydus
Skip Password
By signing up, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy
"I was drawn to Wright Research due to its multi-factor approach. Their Balanced MFT is an excellent product."
By Prashant Sharma
CTO, Zydus
"I was drawn to Wright Research due to its multi-factor approach. Their Balanced MFT is an excellent product."
By Prashant Sharma
CTO, Zydus
Log in with Password →
By logging in, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy
"I was drawn to Wright Research due to its multi-factor approach. Their Balanced MFT is an excellent product."
By Prashant Sharma
CTO, Zydus
Log in with OTP →
By logging in, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy
"I was drawn to Wright Research due to its multi-factor approach. Their Balanced MFT is an excellent product."
By Prashant Sharma
CTO, Zydus
Answer these questions to get a personalized portfolio or skip to see trending portfolios.
Answer these questions to get a personalized portfolio or skip to see trending portfolios.
(You can choose multiple options)
Answer these questions to get a personalized portfolio or skip to see trending portfolios.
Answer these questions to get a personalized portfolio or skip to see trending portfolios.
Answer these questions to get a personalized portfolio or skip to see trending portfolios.
(You can choose multiple options)
Investor Profile Score
We've tailored Portfolio Management services for your profile.
View Recommended Portfolios Restart